In an
ever-changing society with common misrepresentation and false needs the
modernist belief remains that technological progress is paving the way to a
brighter future for current and next generations. As industrialization and scientific
breakthroughs reach new heights, human lives are made ‘better’ by technologies
we have grown dependent on for our day-to-day lives. With these rapid changes a modernist can’t
ignore the risk this has brought to our, “…free
thought and individuality.” (Creeber, 2009: p. 12) It is their distaste to the repercussions of
modernity that makes their belief paradoxical by nature, both loving and hating
the results being produced.
Modernism
is a key reason for the decline of old media, but consumer demand is as
responsible for advancements being so rapid and the use of mass production for
mass consumption. Industries escalated their production line to
manufacture cheaper and more accessible products to the public. Ford’s own methods of mass production for
automobiles is what began the ‘Fordist’ philosophy that was apparent at
affecting various areas of mass culture.
This replication of not just objects but television, novels and other
media products is exactly what modernists feared would continue. The opportunity to find something with a
unique quality becomes more of an impossibility, especially when consumers
demand more of the same.
Briggs
famously says, “…we are apparently
setting out to give the public what we think they need – and not what they want
– but few know what they want and very few know what they need.” (Cited by
Briggs 1961: 238) This intriguing yet
terrifying notion bares a lot of weight as society relies a lot on new media to
provide them with options on purchases, entertainment etc. Through no fault of our own we have been
subjected to it for so long we no longer realize whether our wants and needs,
are actually ours.
Only
until fully understanding semiotics can a consumer even begin to decode hidden
messages underneath the multitude of media texts and develop a resistance
against its influence. Whether the advantages from mass
industrialization outweigh the disadvantages is another argument altogether,
but there is no denying the lasting effect it is having on our generation and
possibly the next.
Bibliography
Creeber, G and Martin R. 2009, Digital Cultures, Open University Press.
No comments:
Post a Comment