Search This Blog

Thursday 31 October 2013

Organics VS Mechanics

We as a society have grown incredibly dependent upon technology as we use it to make our everyday lives less of a burden.  While there is no denying the rapid advancement of technology of the past few decades being extremely valuable to our growth as a species, the long-term effects could diminish our own independence.  Technologies have contributed to our understanding of ourselves the universe and what the possibilities may hold for the future of our race.  The irony in this is that, “we may have ‘made’ the machines but now, in a very real sense, they make us,” which is especially true to the extent it has even been touched upon in films such as Pixars feature film ‘Wall-E’. (Shaw, 2008, pg.88)   

As we thrive and build upon technology that makes our lives better we lose touch of what we did to adapt and survive in the first place before it even came along.  Our reliance on ourselves is essentially diminished and we are left with an essential expectation that technology will push us forward without us even attempting to control the final destination.  While we grow and prosper with these new technologies we can argue that it is destroying what it means to be human.  The idea of the perfect ‘soldier’ would be one that obeys orders and makes decisions based on calculations, not emotion.  The real question we should be asking is can we trust mankind to protect itself?  Somehow we have to believe that human decency will triumph over our desire to technologically advance ourselves.

Our love of technology now makes us wonder what possibilities lie in wait for fundamentally changing who we are.  We must remember that while technology gives us strength, this can lead to dominance, which can lead the way to abuse.  Using technology to become something more than we are can risk our ability to love and make moral choices, the very thing that make us human.  We can only hope this isn’t what the future holds.  



Shaw, C (2008) Technoculture: The Key Concepts (Oxford: Berg Press)

Technology and People

New Media exists because of technology, it only exists as New Media when it’s viewed using technology like a laptop or a mobile phone. We are almost inseparable from this technology in that it’s increasingly difficult for us to live without it in some way. This goes hand in hand with a media saturated culture, both New Media and technology are everywhere around us, even in the more mundane things like the operating systems in your phone are all graphics based user interfaces that the user interacts with.
We created technology and how we use it changes us as we continue to improve technologically and create new things. The discovery of the circulatory system by William Harvey has shown us that technology grants us a better understanding of ourselves and with that we can create new technologies that influence other aspects of our lives (Shaw, 2008, pg.81)

We think of technology as an extension of ourselves, how we present ourselves online can be tailored to our wants through the use of this technology, be it edited photos or through the use of computer generated avatars that can be male or female regardless of which we are in reality, or even through the aspects we present on social networking sites. These versions of ourselves aren’t separate from us but are part of us.

In a world with technology infiltrating every aspect of our lives, the old ways of dividing people into classes of race and gender, among other things, start to become irrelevant and “These divisions are increasingly difficult to maintain” (Shaw, 2008, pg.87) Divisions like these in society are fading away quicker and quicker, especially in online spaces where we represent ourselves as we please and this will trickle into real life and hopefully change the way we think and our culture even further than it has done already.

Bibliography

Shaw, D (2008) Technoculture: The Key Concepts, Oxford Berg Press

Wednesday 30 October 2013

Techno Culture and Human Bodies

It has been suggested by Debra Shaw that humans have a correlation to machines, rather than two different entities. Using the of the body's circulatory system as an example Shaw compares it to working with medical tools to create our 'natural' understand of the human body. Shaw tells us about William Harvey building upon Galen's findings how the heart served its purpose. Shaw continues to say "produced by technology in the simple sense that Harvey had necessarily to use tools to examine the workings of the heart."(Shaw, 2008, p.82) This suggestion allows us to make correlations between machines and the human bodies being repaired and reassembled using tools. 

There is a fixation among individuals to create ideological embodiments of there perfect self using technologies which have only advanced because of our understand of the human body. The example used within Shaw's Technoculture is that of Bruce Springsteen and the modern geek. Bruce Springsteen used in the consumer society to relate towards those of the working class by doing so creating a body that was enhanced with technologies within a gym.

"He thus signifies the passage from the body of the industrial worker, marked by social class, to the body of the late capitalist consumer" (Shaw, 2008, p.85). 
 
Emphasizing Shaw's notion of Bruce Springsteen, the modern geek, as the machine driven body can be constructed to fit the ideological stance within their cyberspace. With the emergence of Web 2.0, the computer literate can create new identities, to enhance properties of themselves otherwise unknown outside of cyberspace. This allows a "construction of a wide variety of private worlds and, through them, for self-exploration". (Turkle, 1984, p.21). With the technology allowing us to use pseudonyms, and be annoymous within cyberspace, the reality creates convergence between collective intelligence and its participatory culture. Do we live as a machine or in a machine?


Bibliography

Shaw, D. (2008). Technoculture: The Key Concepts. Oxford: Oxford Berg Press.
Turkle, S. (1984) The Second Life: Computers & The Human Spirit 
Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence Culture, where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press. 



Rise of the Human Machine

"...the concept of 'human' is unthinkable without technology but we act as if it is." (Shaw, 2008, p.81)

Today within the 21st century we are constantly surrounded by a non-stop technology feeding us our media texts. Our lives have become so interconnected with technology that it appears that we can not exist without them what so ever. We would not be able to live our everyday lives without the technology that we have become accustom too, as it has made us live easier lives. Mobile phones especially have become vital to our lives. From these small devices we can continually communicate to people, play games, watch video, listen to audio and download any file we wish.

Furthermore with other technological devices such as computers we can create an online version of ourselves, who is a completely different representation of who we really are. This can be done in many different forms on the internet. We can create avatar's in online games and use them as a representation of ourselves within the game. We use these technologies to reinvent ourselves as we may not be satisfied with our real world lives and decide to start over online. We become more interconnected to technology this way, as it defines the ways we can recreate ourselves.




Moreover Facebook and Twitter as basic and common they may seem also are used to reinvent our self images. And these forms can be easily be accessed through the mobile devices we constantly carry around. so there for we have constant access to these re-inventors of identities. We then see the technologies that let us do so as an extension of our own bodies and there we then become cybernetic as a result. This then causes us to further depend on the technologies that we use day to day as if we lose them, we then in turn begin to lose our self of identity; whether it be real or a digital form of ourselves. 

"Machines... 'R' us." (Shaw, 2008, p. 81)

Bibliography:

Shaw. D. (2008) Technoculture: The Key Concepts, (Oxford Berg Press)


Video:
Holiday Inn Express- Youtube channel. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9PYIwPSaj4

Are we human or are we technology?

In today's society, people can't do without technology. The most popular device used by mass culture is mobile phones, using these devices give us quicker access of communication. As these are imbedded as an extension of the human body that we can't go anywhere without. However this new technology plays a higher role in new media. When William Harvey's unearthed the circulatory system it leads to the impression that using technology to discover the system helps to evolve technology on discovering how the body functions.

"the concept of 'human' is unthinkable without technology but we act as if it is." (Shaw, 2008, p.81)

Society revolves around these technology such as laptops, mobile phones, tablets which we are growing up with, there is not that many people in society that are not I.C.T literate. These concepts can be associated with Michel Foucault who identifies

"the soldier is 'manipulated, shaped, trained' so that it 'obeys, responds," (Shaw, 2008, p.82)

As people we understand what it means to be human whether we are male or female. This considerations comes across from a higher power in the context of how we function and our appearance as a gender. Fred Pfeil discusses Bruce Springsteen's projection, and the icons that follow.

"he moves activate a form of consciousness that refers to industrial technology... masculine identity in a time of insecurity and flux."(Shaw, 2008. p.84) here he is then marked from fitness to health and also items of clothing as consumers. As this is relating to what is the norm to a mass culture, as society buys into produces created to be marked to their insecurities

"In Foucault's term...is a 'marked' body."(Shaw, 2008, p.85)

Cyberspace is often a retreat from the realization of influences that are market towards consumers, giving the attentive of being what or whoever they choose to be situated as their own individual. Gibson refers to this as

"bodiless exultation of cyberspace"(Gibson,2008, p.86)

As a conclusion humans wouldn't be able to progress information fast, if it wasn't for technology, in addition to technology couldn't be as advances without humans pursuing to establish further.

Bibliography
Shaw, D (2008) Technoculture: The Key Concepts (Oxford: Berg Press)

Super "Meat" Identity

Our cultural cyborgification has been written into our very DNA and has left a digitized finger print on all that we perceive to be apparent in our everyday lives. Societies "retreat from the flesh marks the dissolution of the body in a incurably informed world in which the 'meat' is constantly manipulated and thoroughly mediated" (Shaw, 2008, p86).  

With regard to the above statement, Shaw looked at the connotations surrounding the idea of the prefect solider and later on in the text he states the unacceptable of a woman's meaty exterior versus their "technological solution to [their] 'problem'" (ibid). He found that the "super" solider worked well inside a team and used a common term "well oiled machine" (Shaw, 2008, p82) to illustrate his point of the prefect human and its fundamentals towards a formation of prefect technologies. As well as the soldiers inside fundamentals towards technologies we have to look at their intended sexuality.


Shaw goes on to write about the imperfection of the woman and the capitalist need to use a technological stance to change their appearance through external environment. Without context we state the soldier to be a man not underlining the fact that they could be a woman and vice versa with the stance towards appearance through external environment.

When reading Shaw's text you find a underlining meaning through his readings, which highlights the stereotypical format of technology. Seen through the points above and the study of Pat Cadigan's cyberpunk story Synners (1991).  Shaw breaks down the human interaction between the four main characters which stated the difference of the weak and their empowerment through the technological and new media stance.

This now leads to "the notion that the media now allows us to all create out own complex, diverse and many faceted notions of personal identity" (Creeber, 2009, p18)


Shaw may look at the embodiment of the "circulatory system" but his underlining factor shows us that technology identifies changes in the world and produces what we understand as the ordinary.


Bibliography:
Shaw, D, (2008) Technoculture: The key Concepts (Oxford: Berg Press)
Creeber, G. (2009). DIGITAL THEORY: Theorizing New Media & Cubitt, D. (2009) Case Study: Digital Aesthetics in ED. Creeber, G. & Royston, M. (2009) Digital Cultures: Understanding New Media; Maidstone, Open University Press.







Rise of the machines


We are living in a post-humanist age, the age of New Media. In this New Media era, Shaw (2008, p.81) argues that “the concept of ‘human’ is unthinkable without technology but we act as if it is”. In this way, Stelarc talks about an obsolete body (Shaw, 2008, p.81), since the body can now be seen as invaded and determined by technology.

During the period of modernism, the idea of the human body was dependent on accepted differentiations, such as the ones between humans and machines and between humans and animals (Shaw, 2008, p.87). These distinctions also legitimized the racial, gender and class divisions. In this respect, Michel Foucault introduced discourse, which has the function to make distinctions between what we recognize as normal or deviant. He sees the male white body as the normal, unmarked body, while all the other bodies are seen as deviant.  Moreover, discourse is reflected in media. Media institutions are disciplining and classifying our bodies and are also disseminating dominant norms, since we are constantly “plugged in to the technology” (Shaw, 2008, p. 86).

However, in our high-tech culture, the body has become obsolete since these binary distinctions are increasingly fading. Especially the opposition between the physical and non-physical is disappearing because of the use of smartphones and tablets. Haraway (1991, p.153) argues that “Modern machines are quintessentially microelectronic devices: they are everywhere and they are invisible”.  Therefore, it is uncertain who the producer or the product is in the relationship between human and machine.

Consequently, The body is now regarded as an unformed and nonstratified ‘Body without Organs’. Moreover, the body is being shaped as a cyborg, a fusion of human and machine, since it increasingly resembles the machines that determine our self-understanding. “We may have ‘made’ these machines but now, in a very real sense, they make us” (Shaw, 2008, p.88). Through the use of technology, we can create our own identity and replace our human shortcomings. We do not need to be a man or a woman, on the internet we are all equal.

Bibliography

Shaw, D. (2008) Technoculture: The Key Concepts; Oxford Berg Press

Haraway, D. (1991) "A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century". Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. Routledge.

Humans and technology

"In other words, the concept of 'human' is unthinkable without technology but we act as if it is." (Shaw, 2008: p.81)

Have we been overcome by machines or are still human? Without technology the human race wouldn't get on very well. Think about how many times you use technology, we are always using are phones and iPods and laptops we couldn't live without these appliances. Try for one day leave your phone down and not use it, I bet u struggle. This shows how new media has overcome and that we can't live without them this shows how new media revolution has took over. This is basically meaning that we aren't being ourselves and that new media and technology has become an extension from ourselves and that we actually need them instead of want them.

Although new media wouldn’t have come about if it wasn’t for us we wouldn’t have evolved if it wasn’t for technology. We have developed a lot over the pasts due to the revolution of technology I would say that we have got smarter but also that we have got lazier as we no longer find the need to do maths we just use a calculator on our phones or we don’t remember history we just google it.

Shaw looks at William Harvey's circulatory system this is telling us that the body is "produced by technology in the simple sense that Harvey had necessarily to use tools to examine the workings of the heart"(Shaw, 2008: p.82) Now a days we don't need tools to look at the heart but that we can actually use technology to look at the heart beat and to do blood pressure and all things like that.

So overall we find ourselves turning into cyborgs as we are no longer ourselves but that we are just a form of media and that we find that humans wouldn't have evolved that fast if it wasn't for technology but also that technology wouldn't have evolved that quick if it wasn't for us.

Bibliography
Shaw, D (2008) Technoculture: The Key Concepts (Oxford: Berg Press)

Shifting ideas of the self

One of the things Shaw discusses in his chapter on Technobodies is that new discourses are imposed throughout the changes in the environment a ‘body’ lives in. A society in which bodies are marked by social class and work implies different ‘truths’ than living in a society in which the emphasis is on capitalism, modern subjects and consumption. It actually comes down to a shift in the cultural consumption (Shaw, 2008, pp. 83-87). This notion goes back to the words of Creeber, who stated that the historical periods of postmodernism and modernism imply a shift in media, media consumption and ways of approaching media (Creeber, 2009, pp. 11-17). As Jenkins cites Pool’s Technologies on Freedom, there no longer exists a one-to-one relationship between a medium and its use (Jenkins, 2006, p. 10). So with New Media being transmitters of multiple messages and carrying out different functionalities, we should consider the way it influences a subject’s notion of how to act and what to be.

Furthermore, this shift in discourses also implies a change in which we would define ourselves as humans. When Shaw states that “the concept of ‘human’ is unthinkable without technology” he might be right in the sense that, in a contemporary culture, the mentioned discourses happen in connection with technology (Shaw, 2008, pp. 81-82). This means that with New Media making their way into our lives, and coexisting with Old Media (Jenkins, p. 14), we could consider their role in the change of this self-definition. The way we define ourselves happens in the extent of  what (new) media offer us. When technology is so engaged with the body, it will manipulate the body in a significant way, in that it offers us the necessary information about the body and determines what and how the body is. This makes us think of the body as a primarily ‘technology’ structure, with ‘technological’ processes coordinating it (Shaw, 2008, pp. 88-89).


Bibliography


Creeber, G. & Royston, M. (2009). Digital Theory: Theorizing New Media: digital cultures. Berkshire: Open University Press.  


Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence Culture, where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.


Shaw, D. (2008). Technoculture: The Key Concepts. Oxford: Oxford Berg Press.



Thinking about the unthinkable human

"[T]he concept of 'human' is unthinkable without technology but we act as if it is" (Shaw, 2008, p.81). Shaw (2008, pp.81-82) illustrates this by the understanding of the circulatory system. Before humans were aware of this it already functioned in the same way, but this understanding had actual consequences in the way people saw and used their bodies. This could be seen as an example of the "Thomas theorem" (Thomas, & Thomas, 1928, pp.571-572). In this way, technology, which is produced by our bodies, also effects our bodies (Shaw, 2008, pp.81-83).

In this chapter society is viewed as a machine of which the people are parts (Shaw, 2008, pp.83-87). This is a fitting metaphor, but it is just one way of looking at society. It could be argued that people have always adapted to their environments in a Neo-Darwinistic way and that societies already ran like machinery before the industrial revolution gave rise to machines. In other words, although the text uses modern concepts to describe being human, these processes already existed long before that.

It is argued that "[t]he body has become obsolete" (Shaw, 2008, p. 87) because advancements in technology make differences less important and even different 'species' can be mixed. Although there is a tendency in this direction, saying that these differences have already vanished could be considered problematic in an age where discrimination -for instance the glass ceiling- is still prevalent. However, advancements like transgenics make it clear that many divisions we use, are surpassed. These old concepts might still be useful in what we could see as Husserl's (1970, p. 127) Lebenswelt but in a slightly more scientific area new ways of distinction have to be found, for instance focussing more on genetic details.

Altogether, this holistic view of body and technology is said to "evade the opposing responses of technophobia and technophilia" (Shaw, 2008, p.91). In the light of this text one could say that these concepts show a misunderstanding of the interconnectedness of body and technology. However, following the Thomas theorem (Thomas, & Thomas, 1928, pp.571-572), it could be said that if people experience technology in this way, it might still be important to look at it like this.

Bibliography
Husserl, E. (1970). The Crises of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. Northwestern University.
Shaw, D. (2008). Technoculture: The Key Concepts. Oxdord Berg Press
Thomas, D.S., & Thomas, W.I. (1928). The child in America: Behavior problems and programs. New York: Knopf.

A world without technology, could you manage?

Without today's technology's, as a society we would struggle to survive and evolve, we are dependent.  Stelarc notes the "idea of human evolution aided and determined by technology", such as within the last 100 years through technological advancements we have evolved more than the previous 1000 years (Shaw, 2008, pg.81). Although there is also an argument that "we may have 'made' these machines but now, in a very real sense, they make us" (Shaw, 2008, pg.88). Technologies which have allowed us to understand the human genome have changed our understanding of what it is to be human. Such as how we can sum up our attributes, our humanity into "Different combinations of 'code'", just as we understand computers through binary code (Shaw, 2008, pg.89).

Societal structures have also formed around the functionality of technology's , such as how Foucault identifies how "the solider is 'manipulated, shaped, trained' so that it 'obeys'", referring to how the functions of technology can be implanted into human behavior (Shaw, 2008, pg.82). This concept can be applied to how we are socialised into society, such as school children trained to move from class to class at the sound of a bell, to store required information, to obey, to become part of the "specialized machine"(Shaw, 2008, pg.82). We try and conform to the ideal, what society expects of us while also judging others who don't fit the mould, in order to "reconfirm what is 'I' by bringing close to us and then rejecting all that has been deemed 'Not-I'" (Shaw, 2008, pg.100).

Marxists argue further that "the worker's body is a commodity", labour to be bought and sold, body's that show "the marks of social status and social class"(Shaw, 2008, pg.83). That our physical appearance, class, gender and status can separate us from the "norm that is invisible and assumed", the perfect image projected by society (Shaw, 2008, pg.85). Our consumer culture permits us to consume products such as fake tan, make-up and fitness products to come closer to this ideal norm. A temporary means of achieving this goal is is that of the "bodiless exultation of cyberspace", leaving our flesh behind for a world where we can become unmarked (Shaw, 2008, pg.86). Explaining the popularity of social networks and online community's such as Pinterest, where we can create new identity's and be validated for technical skills which aren't as valued in real life.

Shaw, D, (2008) Technoculture: The key Concepts (Oxford: Berg Press)

Technobodies

According to Debra Shaw "the concept of 'human' is unthinkable without technology" (2008 pp.81). What she means by this, and what she sets out to explain, is that the whole concept and understanding of what it means to be 'human' could not have developed over the course of history without the use of technology. In addition to this she attempts to go further by arguing just how closely linked technology has been in understanding what is suggested by 'humanity', contending that "technology should not be considered an adjunct to the body or in opposition to it but as a determinant of its ontology" (ibid.)

To exemplify this assertion Shaw examines William Harvey's discovery of the circulatory system, and does well to exhibit that, not only is our understanding of the body "produced by technology in the simple sense that Harvey had necessarily to use tools to examine the workings of the heart" (2008 pp.82) but at the same how technology "produces the body because... increasingly complex and sophisticated technologies allow us to examine it in more detail" (ibid.). We can therefore argue that this example is effective in how it describes how our understanding the body is shaped by currently existing technology, and how the body in turn serves to evolve technological progression.

Bearing this in mind we can link this idea with Foucault's concept of the body as "an object of knowledge" (Shaw, 2008 pp.82) where bodies are likened to machines in that they are "crafted according to the dictates of certain requirements" (ibid).With this approach, it can be argued that these requirements represent the ideals and standards dictated in society to which we must conform. Added to this idea of the body as an object is the Marxist principle decreeing that "the worker's body is a commodity to be bought and whose value is determined by the fluctuations of the market" (Shaw, 2008 pp.83). This leads on to the rather bleak notion that the body having now become a tool, crafted in a certain way by set requirements, assuming its place in the overall machine of society to learn "the ritualised movements of factory production" (ibid.) and continuing the process.



Shaw, D (2008) Technoculture: The Key Concepts (Oxford: Berg Press)

Tuesday 29 October 2013

We are human, Aren't we?

"The concept of 'human' is unthinkable without technology but we act as if it is"
(Shaw, 2008: p.81)

Shaw opens the chapter with a paraphrase of the quote from Stiegler (1998) where he claims "The human [..] invents himself in the technical by inventing the tool - by becoming exteriorised techno-logically" (p.141)

Shaw is talking about the means which we find out for ourself that we are human. The technological advancements in departments such as health and sports, help us program, monitor and test out bodies to see if everything is running as it should be. The idea that there needs to be blood pumping around out bodies to be alive, only came about after Galem understanding of our veins and hearts. This was later proved to be incorrect, when William Harvey's findings, which were aided by technology, showed that blood came from and to the heart. 

We can also look at different objects which hold a similar principle. For example, gender, race, age, class. These are things which are highlighted in our society, more than what they should be. Of course, race and gender have their obvious technicalities, but society uses these to categorise humans into separate groups, as if to divide us. Shaw re-refences to the quote made ealier in the chapter, which said that "bodies are obsolete", (Shaw, 2008: 81) and pushes this even further, saying that the human body in society is "dependent on accepted differentiations" (Shaw, 2008:87)

Gender is the most prolific of this differentiation. As with the first 30 seconds of being born, a baby is judged on whether it is male or female. Its a baby, a human, but according to society, it has already been deemed as to which class it will be placed in.

I can never imagine a society without these classes. It will never happen.

Bibliography
Shaw, D. (2008), Technoculture: The Key Concepts, Oxford Press.
Stiegler, B. (Technics and Time, 1: The Fault of Epimetheus. Stanford: Stanford University Press.